JOB Then and JOB Now

 

JOB Then and JOB Now: Conclusion

part 3

To view all three parts go to www.hielema.ca/blog

The End is in the Beginning.

JOB’s three so-called friends, later joined by a fourth, fanatically believed in the equivalent of the North American doctrine that God rewards strict religious observance. They were convinced that somehow Job had deviated from that. Before his suffering JOB too had adhered to this orthodox teaching which he had held as gospel truth. However, after his encounter with a series of unexpected mishaps, JOB changed his mind: “No”, he defiantly told God, ”No, I have not sinned. No, God, you are making a grave mistake.” Consequently the book of JOB eases us into a revolutionary prospect that we can argue with God against God, and that this is our God-given duty. The book does this both beautifully but also in a somewhat mysterious way.
The book is beautiful because it reads like an ancient heroic tale. It is mysterious because it is almost certain that JOB never lived. I think it is in the Bible because there is an intimate connection between JOB Then and JOB Now. Here’s why.
(1) I believe that JOB represents not the people of Israel, for the simple reason that there is no real Jewish connection evident in the book of JOB at all, but the entire world, both ancient and contemporary. In other words, God is saying that Israel, as a nation, is no longer an exclusive people, but that everybody in the world, past and present, is included in his plan for salvation.
That would be a drastic change. Thus the writer of the book of JOB points to a new relationship between humans and God then and now, one based not simply on obeying God’s laws as outlined in the books of Moses, the Torah, or faithfully going to church, but especially on a vibrant, all-inclusive lifestyle, expressing a deep appreciation for creation, and thus living so that its wellbeing is constantly considered.
God wants all people, not only Jews, to be saved, a thought that met with a lot of denial and resistance in the pre-Christian church, so much so that some 800 years later, when Jesus appeared on the scene, his disciples still had not fully absorbed these new emphases. I also believe that God looks with compassion on those who follow his creational laws, recognizing Him as the origin of life, something Romans 1: 20 points to.
(2) And then there are these disastrous happening and the matter of this Satan figure. Where do this creature and these calamities fit in? Here I have to fast forward some 800 years again, to the New Testament time of Jesus at the start of his ministry as related in Matthew 4. There the Satan showed Jesus all the glories of the world, the Egyptian pyramids,  the Greek Parthenon, the splendor of Rome, the Inca institutions, the marvelous temples in Indonesia and Asia, and offered the entire world and its glories to Jesus, on the condition that Jesus bow down and worship the Satan.
Jesus does not dispute that Satan is the ruling power of the globe: on the contrary, he later calls him ‘The Prince of the World.’ Yes, the Satan, now more than ever, is controls the world, witness the Holocaust, Rwanda, AIDS, cancers, wars, Climate Change, the religious Right.
This explains also why this book is not popular with the theologians: it is simply too controversial. Is Satan in charge today? Yes.
(3) When finally God speaks to JOB, he opens JOB’s mind to some radical new thinking. The book tells us that we are never able to rest on past achievements, that there simply is no retirement for us ever.
Already the word “the land of Uz” gives an indication of this new meaning. Dr. David Wolfers, the author of Deep Things out of Darkness, a 550 page book dealing exclusively with JOB, translates the word “Uz”, (the physical location where JOB supposedly lived) as “the Land of Council.” He thinks that the book asks us to look at the Bible with a critical eye, to weigh its ideas carefully and consider them to see whether we express the right view. In other words, he recommends that churches, mosques and synagogues everywhere, must meet to discuss, probe, investigate and discover what the gospel means for us in this millennium. No longer are matters clear-cut: we have changed, circumstances have changed, the world has changed.
(4) And then there are the four friends. Dr. Wolfers, himself a Jew who devoted 20 years of his life to the study of JOB, thinks that they may stand for three or four ethnic minorities within the Jewish nation, with their different types of worship, all centering on a faulty view of God. Transposing the scene to the religious JOB Now, I believe it could well be that the first three friends, in our time, represent the three major orthodox religions: Judaism, based on the Old Testament only, orthodox Christianity, both the Protestant wing, mostly influenced by Gnosticism and hierarchical Roman Catholicism- still stuck on papal infallibility and male dominance- and Islam, later joined by the fourth in the form of the so-called Christian Right, all based on the false doctrine of either good works or a stagnant view of God.
Although JOB replies to the first three speakers, he wisely does not enter into dialogue with the orthodox Christian Right, which, he thinks correctly, is a waste of breath.

The most liberating element about the entire book of JOB is that here is a human being who is not a good and patient and pious God-fearer, but a person who fights God with all the passion he can muster. The New Testament speaks of such a person as one who is blessed because he or she hungers and thirsts for righteousness and is willing to die for that ideal.
JOB is suffering because God wants to teach JOB something. God wants to teach JOB that he must let go of some of the ideas he has about God, taught by previous generations, true for them in their time, perhaps, but not true for JOB now.
Only when God had personally spoken to JOB, only then did he understand for the first time in his life- and his suffering was the turning point- that God was different than he first had imagined. He expressed this when he said: “I have heard of you with my ears, but now my eyes have seen you.” JOB’s idea of God was based on the oral traditions: what his ancestors had told him, what he had heard in numerous sermons. But now something different is forming in his mind, some new thoughts and new ideas. The eye of his mind is seeing a new God and also, looking inward, is seeing a new JOB.
And what is it that JOB starts to see?

The book’s Central Point.

Here I come to the central point of the book, which makes it one of the most profound sources of contemporary spirituality. The accusing Angel believed that JOB was only obedient to God because God had made him rich and prosperous, and so the Satan thinks that JOB will curse God if his blessings are taken away. However, there the Satan miscalculated. True, JOB was initially very much concerned about himself and his family. He figured that, because he was so rich and so blessed with possessions, he was the centre of the universe.
The sin of JOB Then, the sin of Israel and our sin, the sin of JOB Now, is Anthropocentrism, the arrogant and deluded belief that the earth and the universe were designed for our benefit and control, something the entire World, including all religions, believes with a passion. John 3: 16 is always wrongly interpreted as if it reads: “God so loved the human race….” When God talks to JOB He says: “JOB, I’ve got a few questions for you. Where were you when I planned the earth? Tell me if you are so wise. Were you there when I stopped the waters as they issued gushing from the womb?”
For verse after verse the voice in the whirlwind rages on, outlining all the interdependent elements of creation- the winds, clouds, thunderstorms, the lightning, lions, antelopes, oxen, ostriches, horses, hawks, vultures, bulls, serpents. The voice lashes out at JOB’s and our narrow self-centeredness, admonishing that he can never understand the complexity and the functioning of the planet and cosmos. “Have you been to the edge of the universe? Speak up, if you have such knowledge,” a remark very applicable today when the Hubble spacecraft probes ever deeper into the universe and the pictures become ever more baffling, or when Mars is being explored and the questions multiply.
What we see here is the very opposite of a universe built for us to manipulate as we will. Instead of being given dominion over plants and animals, or a license to subdue creation, JOB Then is told- and we, JOB Now, with him- to bow down and be humble and love ‘the cosmos’. He and we are required to understand absolute humility before the face of God and thus JOB says in the end: “I have heard of you with my ears (heard the Torah, heard hundreds of sermons) but now my eyes have seen you. Therefore I will be quiet, comforted that I am dust.”
The Hebrew word for ‘dust’ here is exactly the same word used in Genesis 2, out of which God fashioned Adam, whose name actually means ‘dust’. So the rebirth of JOB is akin to becoming Adam. He is the prototype of the New Humanity, in line with Jesus, God’s son.

As a parable JOB represents the New Adam, the New Humanity, fully at ease being human, being of the earth. Dust we are; ‘Adam’ we are and to dust, to ‘Adam’, the New Adam we shall return.

JOB’s Surrender

His ultimate surrender is not the sort of mindless obedience often required by orthodox religion. It is the kind of surrender that is “the whole-hearted giving of oneself,” a surrender to God’s creation, His Universe, arising from a humility that leads to wisdom instead of self-centered pride. JOB is born again, converted from an ego-centered person to an eco-centered consciousness based on awe for God and His great creation. That is the basic message of the book of JOB. Dietrich Bonhoeffer, the great German Theologian killed by the Hitler crowd in April 1945, just before the end of World War II, says in Schoepfung und Fall (Creation and Fall): “God, brother and sister, and the earth belong together.” That is the coming new Trinity, to be implemented now. We are not here to maximize personal consumption and to glorify individual greed, the basic message of the gods of our age. As citizens of the world we must, following JOB’s message, progress from being ego-centered to becoming eco-centered.
We know what happened to JOB. The story is well-known how he received double his capital as well as his family back.
Here is another reason why the Book of JOB is so curiously contemporary. Consider the following: the most up-to-date detail in the epilogue is the mention of JOB’s daughters. In this new world where JOB Then and JOB Now merge, which is humanity’s future, these fair women are not inferior to the brothers and do not have to go to their brothers’ houses for the annual celebration. Indeed, they are given the same honour by receiving a share of JOB’s wealth as their inheritance, totally new for that age. Each is named, while the seven sons of JOB remain anonymous. The names themselves- Dove, Cinnamon and Eye-shadow- symbolize peace, abundance and a specifically female kind of grace. The story’s centre of gravity has shifted from righteousness to beauty and the focus is now the manifestation of inner peace.

Female Beauty

And something else: “And in all the world there were no women as beautiful as JOB’s daughters.” There is something enormously satisfying about the prominence of women at the end of JOB. Here they are especially included. The lesson here is that JOB, and in JOB all people, have learned to surrender not only their erroneous ideas about God but also their male compulsion to control. The daughters have almost the last word. I think that even though now women are still secondary in many cultures, especially in religious institutions, in the new world they will be more than equal.

And in the entire world there were no women as beautiful as JOB’s daughters. What JOB also tells us is that in the world to come there will be great appreciation for beauty, including female beauty.

We see more and more how organized Religion has lost the Gospel of the Earth. No wonder it has stagnated. Those who want to find this ‘gospel of the earth’ need look no further than the Book of JOB.

In short the book of JOB depicts the history of the world: first the ideal situation, then the Satan episode, spoiling the perfection, followed by hardship, questions, wrong theology, God’s answer and the final restoration with double the blessings.

The End is in the Beginning

Everything has a beginning and an end. Now, at the edge of the End-time, our world will descend to the state it was before, when everything will revert back to what existed in the time before the Beginning, the Primeval Time. Just as death is close to birth, so the down­turn is not far from the upswing. Just as all that has been neatly ordered stems from chaotic disorder, emanating from the fog of the Primeval, so the cosmos too will revert back to that same undefined state. The End?time is nothing else but the return to the Beginning before history. Not only do we ourselves need a re-birth: all of creation will be re-born, allowing us a New Beginning. It is for this newness that we live, building on Christ’s promise in Revelation 21: 5: “I am making everything new!”

Yes, The End is in the Beginning.

 

Bibliography
The Book of JOB, Stephen Mitchel, North Point Press
The Comforting Whirlwind, God, JOB and the scale of Creation,
Bill McKibben, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company
Deep Things out of Darkness, David Wolfers, Pharos & Eerdmans
The Lost Gospel of the Earth, Tom Hayden, Sierra Book Club

A Testament to Freedom, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Harper San Francisco
The End of Science, John Horgan, Helix Books
Antwoord uit he Onweer ( A ‘Thunder’ Reply ) Dr K.H. Miscotte
JOB, Challenging a silent God, Nick Overduin, CRC Publications.
The Hidden Face of God, Richard Elliott Friedman, Harpers
Time Magazine, August 4 1997

Between Beginning and End: a Radical Kingdom Vision, J. H. Bavinck, Eerdmans (Forthcoming)

Approaching the End, Stanley Hauerwas, Eerdmans

Creation and Fall, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Fortress Press.

 

Next week:

The first part of a series on WHERE ARE WE?

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Co-owning the Earth | Leave a comment

JOB Then and JOB Now

JOB Then and JOB Now

Part 2.

The End is in the Beginning.

Why do I blog?

‘JOB Now’, meaning we and our world, is entering a ‘JOB Then’ situation, indicating cosmic disasters. Scientists these days are talking about tipping points and planetary boundaries, about human activity pushing the planet beyond its limits. In a recent study, 22 leading scientists warned that “humans likely are forcing a planetary-scale transition with the potential to transform Earth rapidly and irreversibly into a state unknown in human experience.”

In plain language it says that our biological resources – water, trees, soil, air – which we now take for granted, will be subject to sudden and unpredictable transformations probably sooner than later.

That means we, personified in ‘JOB Now’, are in deep trouble, something the church can no longer ignore, because that trouble plays out in a world chockfull with the inequalities that flow from deeply entrenched power structures, both within individual countries and between the so-called developed and developing worlds. Stir in the ecological crises which will greatly exacerbate existing problems rooted in the unjust distribution of wealth and power, and our troubles are likely to magnify exponentially. I see it as the role of preachers and self-appointed bloggers like me to warn our society that we are in deep denial, denial that is especially anchored in the relatively privileged sectors, such as organized religion where our affluence insulates us from the immediate consequences. Bonhoeffer’s advice to the Church of Christ, in his introduction to Creation and Fall, is: “To witness to the end of all things, to live from the end, to think from the end, to act from the end, to proclaim its message for the end.” In this the church fails miserably.

Therefore  I see it as my duty to sound the unpleasantly loud alarm that we must drastically change the way we think, move, worship, especially the latter, because only as a community can we prepare ourselves for the future.

What has this to do with JOB Then?

The Book of JOB is all about personal catastrophes that represent global happenings. JOB’s friends, in their out-dated ideas, are part of that as well. JOB’s friends are the typical, judgmental know-it-all believers, be they Christians, Muslims or Jews who know exactly why JOB is in this deplorable state: it is God’s punishment. We too, in our out-dated orthodox religions, often see the law, traditions and ecclesiastical confessions as more important than love without preconditions. When JOB was rich and healthy, his friends valued his opinion (being rich always gives enhanced credibility) but not anymore. Now something has changed and it is not they. It’s JOB. His suffering has made him a different person. Now the God JOB relies on is a totally different God. Who is right? JOB honoring a mysterious, unknowable God or his companions who revere a God about whom they know everything?

Eliphaz bluntly tells JOB in Chapter 15: “JOB, you are undermining religion and crippling faith in God.” Sounds familiar to me! Buddy Bildad dooms him to hell in Chapter 18: “Brimstone will be strewn on your household.” But JOB stubbornly clings to his faith when he says in Chapter 19:25: “I know that my Redeemer is alive and that in the end He will stand upon the earth. He will plead for me in God’s court; he would stand up and vindicate my name.”
Amazing words. Unbelievable what suffering can do to people. It can totally change them. The Satan had not counted on this sort of conversion, a conversion brought about by the suffering God inflicted upon JOB. He had figured that JOB’s theology would be stagnant, a theology teaching that religion never is for nothing. I once heard a radio preacher say that the road to prosperity is simple: “start everyday with prayer, go to church, tithe, of course give to his radio or television program and read the bible.”
The Satan wanted to score a fast one with God, and prove once and for all that JOB would deny God as soon as he had become a welfare bum. But he failed in JOB, because this sort of tit for tat is the theology of the devil.
JOB’s story tells us that there are no immediate rewards to religion and by this I don’t mean that being religious does not benefit people now. It does. Religion gives people, in general, a moral focus, stability, security and a purpose in life.
Suffering can teach us wisdom. Faith can find expression in wisdom and in Chapter 28 we see the continuation of JOB’s conversion, because conversion is always a slow and never-ending process, just as acquiring wisdom is. Here JOB confesses his basic ignorance. He, who once was very rich, now confesses that being well-off can hinder the development of wisdom, something we, prosperous Westerners, forget at our peril. In his suffering JOB’s conclusion is wonderful: “Behold, the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom, and to shun evil, that is understanding.”

What next?
After all these torrents of words, silence. “What next?” these former friends wonder. Then the Lord spoke to JOB out of a whirlwind. God Himself answers JOB personally. The Hidden One remains hidden, but not completely. God addresses Himself to the one person who has asked constantly “Why”. The other four men knew the answers, gave the pious platitudes, were comfortable, and avoided the touchy issues, reminding me of most of the sermons I have heard all my life. God did not direct himself to the four men but to JOB, who had suffered, and was puzzled by it all.
The curious thing about the Lord’s sayings is that they all come as questions. “Where were you when I founded the earth? Who determined its measurements – if you know? Do you know the seasons of the mountain-goats? Have you marked the calving of the deer? “Do you give the horse its strength” Do you cloth his neck with thunder? Do you understand the sea and can you grasp from where all these waters come and what purpose they serve? Have the portals of Death been rolled back for you?”
Now it dawns on JOB that his suffering, which he had made the central point of the universe, is nothing compared to God’s greatness, to his over-arching wisdom. While God hurls these questions at JOB, a strange peace descends on him. He starts to realize that part of the secret of salvation is that God does things just for the sake of doing things. He now starts to see that all of life is a miracle which needs neither a reason nor a cause but no other ground than God’s creative act, no other purpose than His own glorification, in which salvation is included.
JOB’s suffering has sharpened his thinking and he discovers to his amazement that in and above all other useful, moral, beautiful goals, rises the one great given that God be known, be lived, be confessed, and believed as the only Divine being. His Essence is nothing else but to live and to give life.
God’s aim for us humans is to have all living entities participate in His fullness. We, humans, are not the only focal point. We are not the totality of creation, although we often think so. John 3:16 explicitly says: God so loved the world, the cosmos that He sent His son. In the world we ask for reasons, but when ask for a reason for the world there is only one answer: the answer is that the pivot of life is God and God alone, who can only be approached through Jesus, who calls himself “The Son of Man”, humanity personified, who wants us to be nothing else but be fully human too, earthly as the earth is earth. We may think that we are powerful with our tools and brains. We are not. Says one of the greatest minds in science, John Wheeler of Princeton, in a book called The End of Science: “As the tiny island of our knowledge grows, so does the great shore of our ignorance.” We, at the height of our scientific powers, are discovering that the more we know, the more we discover we don’t know. The real Answer, the key to the Universe is now as elusive as ever and more and more scientists are admitting that. What God wants JOB to understand is that God is Infinite in His creative powers, Infinite in the beauty of creation, Infinite in the design of His work of Art. God wants ‘JOB Then’ and ‘JOB Now’ to marvel at His ingenuity. He wants both JOBs to be astounded by the revival of nature in the spring, by the multitude of flowers which adorn the landscape, by the erratic flight of the swallows, the steaming heat of the summer, the almost plaintive sounds of autumn, the stark dignity of the winter landscape. He wants JOB Then and JOB Now to affirm that their first duty in life is the enjoy God forever, and this pleasant duty starts with marveling at his creation.
When God is finished, all JOB can do is to exclaim in utter surrender in Chapter 40: “How can I reply to you? I lay my hand on my mouth. Once I have spoken, but I cannot answer; even twice, but I can no more.” His conversion is affirmed when he confesses in chapter 42:
“I know you can do all things and nothing you wish is impossible.
Who is this whose ignorant words cover my designs with darkness?
I have spoken of the unspeakable and tried to grasp the Infinite.
Listen and I will speak. I will question you: please, instruct me.
I heard of you with my ears; but now my eyes have seen you.
Therefore I will be quiet, comforted that I am dust.” That last word ‘dust’ means earth: earth we are and to earth we shall return.
JOB did not find a solution for his questions, but he did find deliverance from his questions. JOB never saw God but his new-found comfort was that God saw him, because JOB came to Him with questions: “Why did you do this, Lord? Why did that happen to me, Lord?”
The meaning of the book of JOB is not that JOB could solve the problem of his suffering in his life or that we can solve the pain and injustice in our lives. We, as JOB Now, are starting to realize that, for the time being, yes, till the very end of time, until the Lord returns, we are on our own. God is testing us JOB Now as he did JOB Then. We now experience what God predicted in Deut.32: 20, “I will hide my face from them and see what their end will be; for they are a perverse generation.”

This perversity applies to us all. The newest Climate Change report, on page 4 of March 31 Globe and Mail and front-page news in the New York Times, cites the risk of death or injury on a wide scale, probable damage to public health, displacement of people and potential mass migrations. That same New York Times issue, on the editorial page, contains a scathing report on Canada’s (read PM Harper’s) disastrous environmental record in connection with the Alberta Tar Sands. It makes me ashamed to be a Canadian citizen. We are on a treadmill to death and nothing will stop the disasters that face us, as JOB Now.

JOB’s Basic Truth

The basic truth of the book of JOB is that we must not take generally accepted truths for granted but that the most basic ideas about God and religion have to be probed and questioned without ceasing. We never arrive; we never can say: we know enough. As long as we live we have to keep up our search for Truth, and we joyfully must accept this. As long as we live we must probe for wisdom.

Fact is that we need a radical conversion. Many of us are shuttled by way of cheap gasoline from climate-controlled house, to an artificially lighted work-place, to a prepackaged supermarket, to a night in front of electronic amusement, and there is little, in all this, to shock one’s level of energy and material use out of the unconscious realm. Just as JOB Then, we need a totally new way of life, not just ‘brother are you born again?’ but consciously trying to live a God- that means Cosmos- pleasing existence.

Next week: The End is in the Beginning: Conclusion of JOB Then and JOB Now.

Posted in Co-owning the Earth | Leave a comment

JOB Then and JOB Now

 

JOB then and JOB now.

Part One

The end is in the beginning.

We all know about JOB, that mythical figure, who is perhaps the Bible’s best known character, after Jesus. The book of JOB is a story with a purpose, which also is the definition of a myth or parable. The purpose of ‘JOB then’, written perhaps 3000 years ago, was to warn Israel about a wrong religion. The purpose of ‘JOB now’ is exactly the same: also a warning about the wrong way of worship.

We all know something about JOB. We know that he was famous for his afflictions and his supposed patience, a man fabulously rich, who suddenly lost all his wealth, his children and in a violent argument with his wife was told to curse God and die.
We also may vaguely remember how three men, come from afar, visited him in his misery, joined later by a younger visitor and how these fellows made long speeches, to which JOB replied. How finally God spoke up, vindicated JOB, rebuked the four friends, after which JOB received twice as much wealth back as well as his family.

The Satan scene

The book is famous for that strange encounter with a mysterious figure called the Satan, who, out of the blue, appears in heaven and when God asks him, “what are you doing here?” says, “Oh, I was going out for a stroll, saw the door open and decided to say hello.”

Strange business, this. Can just anybody enter heaven? To me it suggests that this entire tale is not a true story but is there to illustrate a certain truth. And what is that truth? That’s what this essay – which comes in three parts – is all about, so stay with me.

Back to the meeting of these two sworn enemies, who actually behave as if they were on a friendly footing. Listen to their casual chatter. The Lord says to the Satan almost as an afterthought: “Say, you get around. In your wanderings have you noticed JOB out there in the land of Uz? I tell you, no better person anywhere in the whole world.”
“No wonder,” replies the Satan: “look, you have given him special protection and have favoured him above everyone else. I bet you that if somebody were to ruin him financially and kill off his immediate family, he’ll curse you to the face.”

That set me thinking. Has this curious encounter between God and the Satan any significance for us today? After all, unless the Bible helps us here and now, it is merely an interesting book of great literary value. What then is the meaning of this meeting for 2014 and beyond? What does this amicable conversation, between two arch enemies – that’s how the rest of the Bible portrays God and Satan – tell us that is valuable for you and me now, at this moment, in our life-time?

So here’s how I see it. It seems to me that JOB then represented the human world in ‘the beginning’, living a ‘paradise-like’ life, where everything was just perfect. However, nothing is more dangerous than having everything.

The Satan is used by God to teach us all a lesson –because life is nothing else than one endless learning process: we never arrive, will never quit learning, not even in eternity. Part of our ‘lesson’ is that JOB was abandoned by God and left to the wiles of Satan, something that applies to us as well: at some point in history the world and we who live in it also were abandoned by God and released in the hands of the Satan. J. H. Bavinck, in his forth-coming book Between Beginning and End: a Radical Vision of the Kingdom makes this quite clear. That Satan now is in charge accounts for the wars, the cancer pandemics, the Holocaust, Capitalism, Global Warming, and the total world-wide destruction we are busy completing. Just like JOB we too need a lesson, many of us too have more than Job could ever dream.

That’s why God in his infinite wisdom says to the Satan, ”All-right. It’s a deal. He is in your power. Don’t touch his body, though.”
And so it happens. JOB loses everything and has no clue about the wager God made with the Accuser.
And JOB? He believed, with all people then and many today, that being rich in possessions was a sign of piety. The Osteen church with its Prosperity Gospel thrives on this: for them being wealthy is a sign of God’s blessings. And evidently the Satan is of that same opinion because he figures that, as soon as JOB would lose his personal and material treasures, he would deny God.
However, even though JOB is reduced to utter poverty, his faith remains steadfast, evident from his famous words: “Naked came I from my mother’s womb, and naked shall I return thither. The Lord gave, and the Lord has taken away. Blessed be the name of the Lord.”
Quite the statement. Just imagine that we, you, I, in one day, see our immediate family killed in a car accident, a drunken driver being the cause; then lightning strikes, our house burns up and we have forgotten to renew the insurance; next, due to a market crash, our portfolio is wiped out, our JOB disappears, and all we have left are the clothes on our body. What would our reaction be? Like JOB? Not likely. But better be prepared: today all signs point to a horrendous future, to perils for which we are totally unprepared. For JOB the sudden downturn came unannounced. We do have warnings, even though we ignore them. All crucial measures of the health of the ecosphere in which we live—groundwater depletion, topsoil loss, chemical contamination, toxicity in our own bodies, the number and size of “dead zones” in the oceans, accelerating extinction of species and reduction of biodiversity—suggest that our high-energy/high-technology society is unsustainable. Because we live in an oil-based society and are rapidly depleting the cheapest and most easily accessible oil reserves, we face a huge adjustment in the way of life on which our existence is based. We now have entered an era of “extreme energy” evident in such dangerous and destructive technologies as hydro-fracturing, deep-water drilling, mountaintop removal, tar sands extraction, all of which will hasten the coming calamities of climate change. Welcome to ‘JOB now.’

Back to ‘JOB then.’
Again a mysterious Satan visit. Again God gives him permission, this time to affect his health. So JOB becomes an AIDS sufferer, quarantined, placed in isolation, somewhere in nowhere. There his wife approaches him and angrily shouts, “Do you still cling to your pious ways? They are no use to you now. Curse God, if he exists and then die like a man!” But JOB remains unperturbed: “Shall we accept the good from associating with the God, and the evil not accept?”

It’s bad enough when our spouse accuses us. However, JOB’s real agony starts when his close friends arrive.

The Three Friends

Of course the big news about his misfortune has spread rapidly through the land (imagine Bill Gates gone broke!), and three friends from far away heard it too and made ready to pay him a visit. Weeks must have passed for this to happen. They often had been JOB’s guests at his lavish banquets where they had enjoyed vigorous but agreeable discussions ranging far afield. When they see JOB in the distance, sitting on a small hill, they stop, sit down and look at him for 7 days and 7 nights, without saying a single word.
JOB too remains quiet, even though his mind is in overdrive. Somehow their body language reveals to him their thinking before they even utter one word. And as they sit there and he sits there, he gets madder and madder, because he is utterly at a loss. JOB tries to fathom why he is suffering so much. Somehow he could bear it as long as nobody sees him. But now he has become a public spectacle. Continuously his mind revolves around the basic question: “God is doing this to me. No, God can’t do this to me. Yes, it is God. No, it isn’t.” He is going crazy. His mind, already weakened by his sickness, cannot think straight anymore.

For JOB one thing is sure: he already knows what these three are going to tell him. A long time ago – at least it seemed a long time ago – when they talked, often till deep in the night, they agreed, God’s favour is reflected in a multitude of offspring and material blessings. And, of course, the opposite is true as well: personal calamity spells sin: the greater the punishment, the more serious the crime against God.
Then he had thought like them. Not anymore. What is happening to him has not happened because he has sinned. No. No. With all his power in his weakened body he now denies this theory. And yet, he still does not know the alternative, he just can’t grasp why God is treating him this way.
As his friends sit there for what seemed like an eternity, silently and disapprovingly staring at him, it dawns on JOB that they are his friends no longer, because people who do not understand your deep-seated anguish, are friends no more.
Suddenly his mind snaps, his patience gone. Who ever said that JOB was long-suffering, had it all wrong. He burst out in a fit of total anger: anger at himself, anger at his own uncertainty, anger at his friends for their cold orthodoxy, their Calvinistic certainty, anger at God for whatever. And he burst out: “God curse the day I was born and the night that forced me from the womb”.
The entire third chapter is one long condemnation. JOB: “Why couldn’t I have died as they pulled me out of the dark. Now I would be at rest, I would be sound asleep.” Hey, no heaven talk there!

Speaker One

His outburst opens a flood. First Eliphaz. Not a word of pity. Only more hammer-blows: “These words will perhaps upset you” so he starts optimistically. “Once you brought relief to the comfortless, but now, when disaster comes to you, you rebel. Tell me, have you ever known anybody who underwent this, being innocent?”
That’s how the first friend starts: Pious words. Cruel words. Conventional words. This fellow knows exactly what God thinks or does. Today we call that ‘gnosticism’, the most prevalent Christian heresy.
But JOB does not buy his line. No longer. In Chapter 7 he challenges God and demands an impartial judgment. JOB knows that in his particular case, even though God has caused him all this misery, only God can be the true judge. So it is no wonder that JOB screams at God, “Why have you made me your target? How come that I am in this miserable condition?” Here JOB plays a dangerous game. He thinks, correctly in my opinion, that he can honour God only through fighting with God. That’s a new angle: Praise God through battling with him. Arguing with God about what has happened to us. Not just meekly say: “OK God, I take what you give me.” No, JOB is different.

Speaker Two

Enter the next speaker: Bildad, of the same stripe as Eliphaz, only more so, even less honourable. He makes a snotty remark how JOB’s kids were spoiled brats. Says he “Your children must have been evil: he punished them for their crimes.” In his further remarks he shows that he actually is afraid that whatever happened to JOB might happen to him as well. His insecurity is best portrayed by his vision of God. He tells JOB: “listen, this is what God wants, because God never betrays the innocent.” To Bildad too God is an open book, for him there’s no reserve, no real fear of the hidden God. To JOB God is a mystery. God is THE mystery. That is God’s essence. After all, a god we can understand is no god.
An essential point of the book of JOB is the relationship between God’s revelation on the one hand and God’s hiddenness on the other. The paradox Christians and agnostics alike face is how God can reveal Himself when He is Hidden, when He is the Totally Incomprehensible One, Mystery Incorporated. JOB, before his ordeal, had a clear picture of God: if he behaved properly, God would bless him. Simple. An article in TIME on the Mormons said unashamedly that “material achievement in the USA remains the earthly manifestation of virtue.” To JOB that idea has been shattered. His earlier notions about God have been found wanting. With Bildad and his companions their concepts about God have become their God. For them there are no divine secrets and no sudden surprises, no mysteries. They know exactly what God has in mind for JOB and so their awe for God has disappeared and their so-called piety has become a form of godlessness.

To be continued next week.

 

Posted in Co-owning the Earth | Leave a comment

How Should we then live? Conclusion

HOW SHOULD WE THEN LIVE (CONCLUSION)

Making Peace with the Planet.

March 23 2014—–Part 12.

Fifteen years ago, in St.Paul, Minn., I bought at the Luther Seminary bookstore A Testament to Freedom by Dietrich Bonhoeffer, containing the essential writings of the German pastor and theologian who joined the resistance against Hitler and was executed in 1945 a few weeks before Germany collapsed.

This 545 page paperback now looks pretty shabby, with lots of high-lightings and comments. In 1932, when Bonhoeffer was 26 years old, already having a double doctorate, already an assistant professor, he wrote an essay on Dein Reich Komme (Your Kingdom Come). On its margin I wrote: “This makes me cry,” and even now, while rereading this it chokes me up because no other writer has so clearly, so provocatively, with such youthful abandonment written about the Kingdom.

So what was it that so resonated with me? After stating that Christianity had become an out-dated replica of heaven, a cluster of sacred shrines and hallowed sanctuaries, all picturing magic escape routes from earthly turmoil, he wrote that faith should be embedded in the way each Christian becomes strong in his or her service of earth and its people, evident in everything we do, including the market place, where we buy, sell, dig, invent, move, whatever. That is a message that then and now resonates with me. Bonhoeffer, 80 years before Climate Change was wreaking havoc everywhere, wrote: “We disdain the earth… because we want to be better than the evil earth…so we are open to the religion of otherworldliness. (In other words: escape to heaven.) We have fallen into secularism, and by secularism I mean pious, Christian secularism. Not the godlessness of atheism or cultural bolshevism, but the Christian renunciation of God as the Lord of the earth. God, brother and sister, and the earth belong together.” Once, in a meeting with Karl Barth, Bonhoeffer, to Barth’s great delight, quoted Luther: “The godless man’s curse can be more pleasing to God than the hallelujah of the pious.” He also wrote: “This pious secularism also makes it possible to preach and to say nice things. (However) the function of the church is to witness to the resurrection of Christ from the dead, to the end of the law of death of this world that stands under the curse, and to the power of God in the new creation.”

Everything we believe is interconnected to everything we believe. If we believe that upon death we leave this earth to end up in heaven, then we also believe that the earth is evil, and that God is imperfect, having created an evil earth. Bonhoeffer writes: “Only they who love the earth and God as one have faith in God’s Kingdom.”

Ridderbos, Bavink, Bonhoeffer

Herman Ridderbos, a Dutch theologian, in his classic The Coming of the Kingdom, writes that “the kingdom is the new ideal form of human society and Jesus’ commandments are intended to bring about its realization.”

This means that Ridderbos, J. H. Bavinck and Bonhoeffer speak the same language. They agree that the Kingdom is God’s creation, this earth, the soil we live on, the clay that constitutes us, the “Adam”, the dust from which we originate. We can only make peace with the planet – and with God – when we see this earth as holy.

That’s why Jesus tells us to Seek first the Kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well? (Matt.6: 33) The ‘righteousness’ mentioned here refers to God’s righteousness, pointing to Micah 6:8, where we are asked to: “Act justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with our God.” Jesus demands the absolute sacrifice for the sake of the kingdom, which entails that our first duty is to seek the welfare of God’s creation, to see the earth as God’s holy gift to us. When we harm it, we harm everybody, every single human being, every animal and plant, nullifying the command to ‘love your neighbour as yourself.” Once Jesus’ command to ‘promote the thriving of creation’ has penetrated into our reluctant brain, and become part and parcel of our personal profile, once this primary truth that loving creation is our first and foremost duty in life, then Jesus promises that our life will find fulfillment; then he assures us that everything else in life will fall into place.

Traditional Christianity no longer relevant

Traditionally Reformed Christianity has viewed life through the spectacles of the church, and, until a few generations ago, when economic development was still within the boundaries of ecological limits, this was the way to go. Thanks to creation destroying oil, in my lifetime, the world’s population has more than tripled. We now need 10 oil calories to produce one food calorie, with the result that by our wanton, licentious, self-indulgent, hedonistic way of life, we have dug our own grave. We now are confronted with “the Limits of Growth” and are daily discovering that the way we go no longer can be sustained. Suddenly everything must be seen in a different light. The question: “How Should we then live?” is taking on a totally different meaning, and calls for a new way to live.

Can we re-create God’s Kingdom here? Should we try?

Enter Wiebo Ludwig

There was a man in Alberta, in a way a maverick, a messianic Christian preacher named Wiebo Ludwig, who died last year. Wiebo is a product of the same background as I am, with the same characteristics: a Dutch immigrant, of Christian Reformed stock, stubborn, striving for self-sufficiency, a touch of self-righteousness. He started a small Christian community in the remote north of Canada’s oil province, sabotaged at least one wellhead by pouring cement down its shaft and blew up others. The Canadian authorities, along with the oil and gas barons, demonized Ludwig as an eco-terrorist, an odd charge given that they were and still are the ones responsible for systematically destroying the environment and the planet.

Wiebo felt that our society was in a spiritual crisis, rather than an environmental or an economic crisis,” David York’s film “HYPERLINK “http://www.wieboswar.com/trailer.html”Wiebo’sHYPERLINK “http://www.wieboswar.com/trailer.html” War” is a good portrayal of Ludwig and his fight with the oil and gas industry. Wiebo felt that our addiction to fossil fuels, rampant consumerism and materialism, breakdown of family units were all symptoms of a society that has lost its root connection to God. Further, he felt that we are in a kind of end-times state, where the forces of good are in a terrible struggle with the forces of evil.

He was one of our era’s most effective figures of resistance against the oil and gas industry, and also a devout Christian, which I am as well.

Ludwig grasped the moral decadence of the consumer society, its unchecked hedonism, worship of money and deadening cult of the self. He retreated in 1985 with his small band of followers into the remoteness of northern Alberta. His community, called Trickle Creek, was equipped with its own biodiesel refinery, windmills and solar panels—which permitted it to produce its own power—a greenhouse and a mill. Its members, who grew their own food, severed themselves from the contaminants of consumer culture. However, Ludwig’s flight from evil only ensured that evil came to him: his land happened to be atop one of the largest oil and gas reserves in the world in the form of sour gas, a neurotoxin that if released from within the earth can, even in small amounts, poison livestock, water tables and people.

The oil and gas companies soon began a massive drilling effort. At first, like many other reformers and activists, Ludwig used legal and political channels to push back against the companies, which were drilling on the edge of his 160-acre farm. He spent the first five years attending hearings with civil regulators, writing letters—he even wrote to Jane Fonda—and appealing in vain to elected officials, government agencies, the press, environmentalists and first nations groups. His family—he had 11 children—posted a sign in 1990 that decried “the ruthless interruption and cessation” of privacy; “the relentless greedy grabbing of Creational resources”; “the disregard for the sanctity of the Lord’s Day”; the legislation of land and mineral ownership policy “that does violence to the God-given ‘right to property.’

His war against industry illustrated the cost of our addiction to hydrocarbons: Our materialistic way of life is based on the destruction of groundwater, the devaluing of rural property, the invasion of rural communities, the poisoning of skies with carcinogens, the fragmentation of landscapes.

How do we combat creational injustice? Do we, like Ludwig, block roads by downing trees and disable vehicles and drilling equipment?

When, after two leaks of hydrogen sulfide sour gas from nearby wells—which forced everyone on the farm to evacuate and saw numerous farm animals giving birth to deformed or stillborn offspring, as well as five human miscarriages or stillbirths within Ludwig’s community—and after the destruction of two of his water wells, he declared open war on the oil and gas industry. Was he right to blow up oil and gas facilities, because he had to fight back to “protect his children”?

The Royal Canadian Mounted Police, accompanied by private security agents hired by the oil companies, spent millions to investigate and attempt to halt the sabotage. Ludwig’s farm was occupied by police five times and searched for incriminating evidence. The police and Encana Corp. infiltrated Ludwig’s tight community with an agent provocateur who, to prove he could be trusted, blew up a well owned by what was then Alberta Energy Corp., now Encana. The explosion, although orchestrated by the police and Encana, was publicly blamed on Ludwig. The oil company also brought in a “terrorism expert” from Toronto to speak at local town hall gatherings—York captures one of those talks in his film—and the expert warned residents of the rising “terrorism” of religious cults led by fanatic, charismatic leaders.

Ludwig, whose knowledge of the terrain allowed him to outfox hundreds of police officers, was never caught in an act of sabotage, but he probably had a hand in damage at hundreds of remote well sites estimated at $12 million. The federal government in Ottawa, in desperation, considered sending in the army. Ludwig was finally arrested in 2000 on five counts of property damage and possession of explosives and imprisoned for 18 months. He spent his time in prison reading and thinking.

But violence begets violence. And the more Ludwig blew up facilities the harsher became the intrusion of the state.

Ludwig’s gravest mistake was his decision or the decision of someone in his small community, to fire on two trucks carrying rowdy teenagers. The sons and daughters of oil and gas workers roared through the group’s compound at about 4 a.m. on June 20, 1999. Karman Willis, a 16-year-old girl, was fatally shot by someone on the farm, and a second teenager survived a wound.

Ludwig, before he died at age 71 after refusing chemotherapy for esophageal cancer, turned away from violence. The renunciation came a year or two after his final bombing campaign. He would read, with his family, Jacques Ellul’s 1969 book Violence: Reflections from a Christian Perspective. Ellul, like Ludwig’s Dutch father, had fought in the resistance against the Nazis in World War II.

Ellul wrote: “The Christian should participate in social and political efforts in order to have an influence in the work, not with the hope of making a paradise (of the earth), but simply to make it more tolerable—not to diminish the opposition between this world and the Kingdom of God, but simply to modify the opposition between the disorder of this world and the order of preservation that God wants it to have—not to bring in the Kingdom of God, but so that the Gospel might be proclaimed in order that all men might truly hear the good news.”

Initially Ludwig was more like an Old Testament Prophet, a rigid patriarch. In that he reflected the present day church, also organized along hierarchical structures, where mostly women are excluded. He, later in life, saw the error of his ways. Will the church, still organized along an Old Testament trajectory, and still heaven-bound, reform itself?

Making Peace with the Planet

In 1990 I bought a book in Toronto: Barry Commoner’s Making Peace with the Planet. Dr. Commoner was the director of the Center for the Biology of Natural Systems at Queen’s College in New York City.

In many ways Making Peace with the Planet means making peace with God who created the planet. Right now we all are at war with God’s world: there’s very little peaceful about our daily activities. We all, without exception, have more or less become allies of God’s great adversary, whose sole aim is to destroy God’s precious creation, the world he loved so much. Commoner provides us with a blueprint that can be followed by all who love the earth, and by doing so express love for its maker. He formulated four laws of ecology which provide us with definite guidelines for wholesome living.

(1)        Everything is connected to everything else.

(2)        Everything has to go somewhere.

(3)        Nature knows best

(4)        There is no free lunch.

Barry Commoner wrote this book in 1975, almost 40 years ago. In Connection with “Everything is connected to everything else”, he used the example of fish. He wrote that a fish is not only a fish, but also a producer of organic waste that nourishes aquatic plants and microorganisms, all elements of an intricate network, all beautifully compatible, so that there is no waste, because “Everything has to go somewhere.” The early Christian symbol also was a ‘fish’ of which the Greek word is ICHTHUS, an acronym for Iesu Christi Theos, Uios. Sooteros, Jesus Christ, God, Son, Saviour. Fish belongs in the ocean. Because we have eliminated much of the fish there, the jellyfish the main food for fish, no longer has a predator and has mushroomed, filling the oceans everywhere. In a new book by Lisa-Ann Gershwin Stung: On Jellyfish Blooms and the Future of the Ocean she sees the jellyfish as an ‘angel of death’, a harbinger of planetary doom. The outlook for the sea, Gershwin writes, is essentially apocalyptic because these jellyfish are ‘marine weeds’: hardy, fast-growing, fast-breeding, adaptable and tenacious. The disappearance of FISH is just another sign of the disappearance of ICHTHUS, that age-old Christian symbol.

The vanishing of fish illustrates that collapse is in the cards. We see this also in the air we breathe, now saturated with Green House Gases. We see this also in the debt we have created, both monetary and environmentally. There too we are gambling with the very basics of our existence.

When Commoner coined “Nature knows best”, he entered the religious sphere. Making Peace with the Planet essentially means acknowledging what Psalm 19 so eloquently states:

“The law of the Lord is perfect, reviving the soul.

The statutes of the Lord are trustworthy, making wise the simple.

The precepts of the Lord are right, giving joy to the heart.

The commands of the Lord are radiant, giving light to the eyes.

The fear of the Lord is pure, enduring forever.

 

Yes, “There is no free lunch”.

The Bible tells us that the wages of sin is death. The result of our riotous living is death, because the death of the oceans, the death of pure air, the death of soil, all point to our own death through sinning against creation.

Making peace with the planet is a prerequisite for making peace with God. The apostle John says it all: “This is love for God (expressed in love for creation): to obey his commands. And his commands are not burdensome, for everyone born of God overcomes the world.” (1 John 5:3).

 

This concludes my series on How Should we then live?

 

Next week an essay on the book of Job, which, in my opinion, is the most up-to-date and inclusive book of the Bible.

 

 

 

 

Posted in Co-owning the Earth | Leave a comment

How should we then live? Part 11

How should we then live? Part 11

Is the demise of Christianity a good thing?

Christianity has deep Jewish roots. In Jewry the Sabbath was diligently kept from Friday sundown to Saturday sundown, infants were circumcised on the 8th day and the strict Mosaic diet prescribed in the books of Moses was faithfully adhered to.

That all ended when Jesus died on the cross. At that moment the curtain of the Jerusalem temple was torn in two from top to bottom (Mat. 27: 51), signifying that a new phase in worship had begun: suddenly temple worship, the Old Testament laws, the Jewish religion based on the books of Moses, became outdated.

Drastic ceremonial changes took place after Pentecost with the visible appearance of the Holy Spirit: instead of worshiping on the Sabbath, the last day of the week, the new converts made Sunday, the first day of the week their focus of celebration, in memory of Jesus Christ rising from the grave on the first day of the week. The act of circumcision was abolished and replaced with the symbolic act of baptism, signifying the cleansing of sin, and temple worship was abandoned to be replaced by the simple and more inclusive act of prayer and community gatherings in peoples’ houses.

For the Jesus’ followers this change from the Hebrew religion, with the temple at its centre, with priests and high priests, with the sacrifice of animals, with the obligatory temple tax, with the stated religious festivals, was total.

It took a while to enact these new measures. Conservative Peter was a reluctant convert: it required a special intervention by the Lord to convince him. And that is OK. Traditions are important, and drastic changes take time. When one of our daughters lived in Beverly Hills, my wife and I once went to a service in a Messianic synagogue there, where all the old-time Jewish rituals were observed, including the required yarmulke, but where the sermon was on Corinthians: quite impressive, actually.

The most decisive phase yet.

Now we are at another phase: the final phase in my opinion, even more radical. Jesus himself hinted at that, I believe. We usually portray Jesus as the kind shepherd figure, a person to whom children flocked and women were attracted. There also is much more controversial side to him: he was accused of being a glutton and drunkard, was scorned for being homeless, celibate, disdainful of kinsfolk, a friend of outcasts, without fear for his own safety, careless of Jewish purity regulations, critical of authority, a scourge of the rich and powerful. Based on that expect the unusual from him.

So when – as recorded in John 4: 15 – Jesus in his typical unconventional manner, talked to a promiscuous woman in Samaria of all places, a city out of bounds for Jews, he told her that eventually worship would no longer take place in Jerusalem, or on her holy mountain, or anywhere else, whether that is your church or synagogue or temple of mosque, whether in Mecca or Rome or Amritsar. Jesus again: “true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth.” That to me suggests the eventual end of formal religion of whatever stripe. At least that’s how I read this.

There are other hints. Stanley Hauerwas – whom Time Magazine called the most influential theologian in North America – in Approaching the End (Eerdmans, Grand Rapids) writes that “We may be nearing the end of Christendom,” which he calls “a good thing,” because it will restore the “recovery of the eschatological character of the gospel”. He says that “the first task of the church is not to make the world just but to make the world the world, which is rightly understood only in the light of these eschatological convictions.” (Eschatological refers to the end of all things.) In other words, the church’s preoccupation with heaven is totally misdirected: its focus should be on the earth and its ultimate renewal.

In this he completely echoes Dietrich Bonhoeffer who, in his introduction to his book Creation and Fall, writes that “The church of Christ witnesses to the end of all things. It lives from the end, it thinks from the end, it acts from the end, it proclaims its message from the end.” In my long-time church exposure I have never heard a sermon emphasizing this, and, I believe, this will not happen either, because the church is too set in her ways. Perhaps Jesus in the Sermon of the Mount, as recorded in Matthew 5, provides a clue as well: if any part of the body causes sin, or fails to live up to its task, cut it out. In that same vein, if allegiance to the church is stronger than advancing the vision of the New Creation, it is better to relegate it to a lesser place.

My personal experience is that neither society at large not the church in general is eager to embrace that ‘end’ concept: it simply is too uncomfortable. When the 2012 Olympics were held in London a six-minute segment of the opening ceremony was omitted by NBC in its U.S.A. television coverage, because the editors felt that the hymn “Abide with Me”, a song of lament, was not suitable for the American audience. They reasoned that the US public had to be protected from death and from a sung message expressing the end of Life. The exact same thing happened with me. When I wrote my regular column on this episode for a Christian paper, it was refused. Here are some excerpts of that article:

Was that “The Global Swan Song?”

I don’t like mega churches, but I loved it when 400 million people world-wide heard an old-fashioned sermon at the opening ceremonies of the 2012 Olympics. It happened at the end of the show recalling the sinking of the Titanic, a name now synonymous with disaster. The ‘lesson’ was delivered by a regal-looking Emeli Sandé who sang all five verses of Abide with me, the hymn supposedly played while that brand-new ship slowly sank into the icy seas. She projected into the planet such biblical truths as:  “Change and decay in all around I see,” but also beamed across the globe the glorious gospel of “I need your presence every passing hour. What but your grace can foil the tempter’s power?”

The Titanic reference couldn’t have been more up-to-date. In 2012, one hundred years after its sinking the entire world is in a Titanic mode: drowning in an ocean of debt. The phrase fast falls the eventide reminded me of Oswald Spengler`s famous book Der Untergang des Abendlandes, the Demise of the Evening Empire. In our Western world, perhaps a few, if any, of the 400 million viewers realized that then and there they may have witnessed “the global swan song”, when she intoned Swift to its close ebbs out life’s little day, earth’s joys grow dim, its glories pass away. It may seem farfetched, but to me it meant that Brazil’s preparations, already underway for the 2016 Olympics may well come to nothing, because the London Olympics could well have been the final one.

Here’s what could very well happen. Today a four year term is like a century, that’s how fast events are happening. Just look at the speed of Climate Change. The most e-mailed article in a recent New York Times issue was: “Hundred – Year Forecast: Drought.” Imagine no rain year after year! (Now true for California and many other regions.)

We are in a real quandary: we have based our society on continuous growth, allowing large pensions, expensive medical and educational structures, libraries and museums, but in a shrinking world all these will become millstones around our necks, sinking the economy as sure as the Titanic. Put the blame on money and its lenders. No wonder Dante in his Inferno consigned usurers to the lowest pit of the seventh circle of Hell.

July 27 2012 was a memorable day: then, it seemed to me, the Global Swan Song echoed through the cosmos. Multitudes of many millions heard the message: Abide with me, fast falls the eventide, the darkness deepens, Lord with me abide. Change and decay in all around I see.” But also “Who like yourself my guide and strength can be? In life, in death, O Lord, abide with me.”

That message was judged too controversial for a Christian audience.

Total Renewal

I sincerely believe that we live in earth’s final days. In the Lord’s Prayer we ask for “Thy Kingdom Come.” Augustine has said: “We can’t do anything without God, and God won’t do anything without us.” That means that we must ready ourselves for the Coming of the Kingdom, with God’s help.

When the Old Testament rituals were replaced by the Christian counterparts, many changes took place. Now we need to go even further than the Christians did in the early church. Metanoia is the new buzz word: total renewal. That concept signifies not a partial life-change but something far more.  Renewal is a factual dying and being born again as a “new creature,” a transition from one particular world to another, from one causing death and pollution to one of permanence and durability. The only place in the first three Gospels where the world renewal appears, points to the end-time and thus contains a clearly eschatological directive. Matthew 19:28 speaks of “the” renewal of all things.” Through “renewal” we are directed toward the end-time, to the new age, the new time-period in which Christ will be Lord. To be human means to stand between Primeval Time and End-Time, between the Ultimate Beginning and the Terrible End. The road between these two extremes of many, many millennia is a road of an untold number of wars, of cruelty and injustice, of sorrow and tears, yet also of always hoping and always trying. Primeval Time and End-Time are at the same time very close together: they meet in Jesus Christ. His coming in the world ushers in the end-time, the new age, the new world. He gathers all things together again into the meaningful whole of God’s eternal kingdom, the New Earth to come. Then will be fulfilled what he said: “The old is gone: see, everything has been made new.”

The old is gone. That also means that ‘all formal religion’ is gone. That is not only a good thing, but also necessary. Bonhoeffer refers to that when he mentioned ‘religion-less Christianity’. In his opinion, this can only happen in a world that is no longer religious. That condition makes it possible for the world and for us who live in it to become aware of ourselves and our eternal place in God’s beloved world. Only then can the reality of Christ have a greater impact on “a world come of age” than when the world wears disguises of religion.

Let’s face it: the world has already gotten rid of God. It’s only when we acknowledge that, says Bonhoeffer, that “Jesus Christ takes possession of the world become of age.” It is Bonhoeffer’s wish that, when ‘religion’ has disappeared, there will be a ‘reformation’ of glad tidings so that they permeate the whole of human life and not merely the religious dimension of human existence. He writes that “it is God’s will that we know him in life and not finally when we die; in health and strength, and not finally when we suffer; in our actions and not finally when we sin.” (His emphasis)

With The End approaching we now must try to live the life of THE KINGDOM, the life of Eternity, a concept much wider than the church.

Here’s what J.H. Bavinck says in the forthcoming Between Beginning and End: A Radical Kingdom Vision (Eerdmans Grand Rapids).

“It is impossible to visualize the immense difference between the majes­tic, harmonious unity of creation as it emer­ged from God’s hand, and the frantic, demon?dominated planet in which we, the cursed human­ity, dwell after the fall into sin. The Kingdom is in shatters. That is the profound tragedy con­fronting the life of the world. This goes far beyond the fact that we have torn up its cohesion: it actually means that God has surrendered his own creation to Satan and his followers, whose only purpose is to abuse it and destroy it. The Kingdom, after all, com­prises all things, all plants, all animals, all people, all angels. The King­dom includes the sea and the land, the moun­tains and the valleys, all that was and is and is to come; and all of it is incorporated in a great and mighty whole. The Kingdom is the place where all things are in their rightful place and where everything can fulfill its function and deploy its potential in complete harmony with all that surrounds it. The Kingdom is synonymous with light, peace, joy, service to God, in harmonious vene­ra­tion. Where the Kingdom is being destroyed, where this structure comes apart at the seams, there is decomposition, brokenness, frag­men­tation, enmity, contra­diction, meaninglessness, darkness, death. The Kingdom is the smile of God’s good pleasure: “See, it was very good.” With the breaking of the Kingdom God hides his face. Psalm 104:29 reads: “When you hide your face, they are terrified.” The glow fades away; something akin to the pall of death covers the world.”

For us to live the way of The Coming Kingdom entails a total metanoia, a complete new vision of what life is all about. The church can be a help in this matter, but only when it serves as an example of this kingdom living.

Seeking affiliation with Greenpeace and with The Suzuki Foundation is one effective way to evangelize. These devoted people already have the welfare of creation in mind, something Kingdom-seekers also must strive for. The modern martyrs are those who obstruct “Growth at all Costs”, who try, imperfectly, to become completely creation friendly, who with every action wonder whether this will harm creation, because ‘creation is holy’. Hauerwas, in his recent book Approaching the End (Eerdmans, Grand Rapids) is the first theologian I know who called Creation ‘Holy’.

The church, by exclusively centering her fallible focus on the Bible – God’s written Word – and by her inability to integrate her message with God’s Holy Creation-Word, runs the danger of losing the all-encompassing totality of The Word and thus the basic message of the Kingdom. That’s why the church could become or already is an obstacle to salvation.

“Small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life (LIFE in the New Creation!), and only a few find it”. (Matthew 7: 14.)  Jesus’ very words!

P.S. I base the above on John 3:16: God so loved the cosmos, the world we live in, so much that he offered his son as sacrifice to restore it. If God’s love for creation is so immense, isn’t ‘loving creation’ the least we can do?

Next week: the final instalment of How Should We then Live?

Posted in Co-owning the Earth | Tagged | Leave a comment

How should we then live? Part 10

HOW SHOULD WE THEN LIVE?

Part 10

THE RISE OF CHRISTIANITY

“The people of the West have discovered history. Perhaps this has been their greatest discovery. With their farseeing periscopes they have pulled the heavenly bodies so close that they had to give up their secrets. They have split the atom into its basic components. They have penetrated the mysterious forces that keep the universe together. All those discoveries were magnificent, but the most important one of all is that the human race discovered history. It is this that has changed its own existence and has given life on earth a new, glorious perspective.”

That’s how Johan Herman Bavinck starts his eagerly awaited book with the telling title of Between Beginning and End: A Radical Kingdom Vision, soon to be published by Eerdmans, Grand Rapids.

Thanks to history which spawned a book with the title of The Rise of CHRISTIANITY we have an idea why people chose the Christian Way. It has given us a historical perspective on happenings almost 2000 years ago. In it Rodney Stark, the author, professor of sociology and comparative religion at the University of Washington, explained how and why early Christianity was so successful. Now that we experience the exact opposite – church closings, denominations struggling with diminishing numbers, confusion in the ministerial ranks – it makes sense to find out how a tiny and obscure messianic movement from the edge of the Roman Empire managed to dislodge classical paganism and become the dominant faith of Western civilization. It may even tell us how to reverse the downward trend.

In my series of How should we then live, The Rise of Christianity will be followed by The Fall of Christianity. That makes sense: nothing rises forever, eventually there is a fall. It is my opinion that, given the current ecclesiastical situation, one that is, I think, beyond reform – some tinkering here and there will not help- the fall of Christianity is not only inevitable but even necessary to pave the way for the New Creation where the Bible and the Church are no longer relevant: more about that in Part 11. Don’t be alarmed: there is a historical precedent for such radical change.

There’s no doubt that the Christian movement has had a phenomenal growth. The author consulted various sources and concluded that the number of Christians grew 40 percent per decade, from a mere 1,000 in the year 40 A.D. to 1,500 10 years later, to 7,500 at the turn of the year 100, to more than 200,000 a century later, increasing five-fold to more than 1,000,000 by the year 250, numbering 6,300,000 in the year 300 and almost 34 million in the year 350 when almost half of the then world population was nominally Christian. It helped that Emperor Constantine himself was favourably inclined toward the new movement.

Who became Christians?

For most of the 20th century historians and sociologists were of the opinion that, when the Way was at its infancy, Christianity was a movement of the dispossessed – a refuge for Rome’s slaves and impoverished masses. They based this on 1Cor. 1:26-28 where Paul writes that there were not many of the wise, mighty and noble. But there were some, and those who joined were quite prominent. In the church of Corinth was Erastus, ‘the city treasurer’. Then cities were like states. In other words he was the minister of finance, not a mean position. Pomponia Graecina in Rome was a woman of the senatorial class. Already Jesus, in his wanderings, attracted high-class women whose husbands occupied prominent positions in the land. Far from being a socially depressed group, some now argue that the lower classes were disproportionally under –represented in the early church. To me that make sense. Here’s why.

Human nature has not changed all that much in the last 2000 years. The Romans pacified the masses through games and food handouts. Today the majority of people, thanks mostly to TV, too have become more passive and no longer open to persuasion. Then as now members of new religions –like Christianity- were almost always members of the more privileged classes. Two thousand years ago what Christianity taught was certainly totally different: love your enemy, no adultery, don’t get rid of unwanted girl babies, don’t divorce, don’t bear arms, all principles completely out of line with the then reigning philosophy.

It is obvious that people don’t switch allegiance to a new faith if they are happy where they are: for many Christianity offered a viable alternative. Is that true for today as well? That’s next week’s topic.

Since Christianity then promoted pacifism – the Jews too refused to bear arms – there was a risk of persecution, especially since the new converts rejected emperor worship. Yet even the most brutal persecution of Christians was haphazard and limited, and the state ignored thousands of persons who openly professed the new religion. The ones most vulnerable here were the leaders who when imprisoned hoped and prayed to rely on their friends and relatives in high places  – often within the imperial family- to use their influence to obtain pardon.

Another myth was that the mission of the apostles among the Jews was a failure. That was true among the very orthodox section. However, a large part of the Jews in the diaspora had become Hellenized, the equivalent of being secular. Their number was quite large: there were many millions of Jews spread around the then known world, perhaps as high ten percent of the world population of some 60 million.

Rodney Stark posed three propositions:

  • New religious movements mainly draw their converts from the ranks of the religiously inactive and discontented, and those affiliated with the most accommodated (worldly) religious communities.
  • People are more willing to adopt a new religion to the extent that it retains cultural continuity with the conventional religion with which they are already familiar.
  • Social movements grow much faster when they spread through preexisting networks.

Based on these three theses he concluded that Christianity offered twice as much cultural continuity to the Hellenized Jews as to Gentiles, with the result that a lot of Jews accepted Jesus as the Messiah. Luke, the author of the bible book Romans, relates how Paul, arriving at a new city, always first made his way to the local synagogue.

Epidemics and Conversion

In his 1200 page CHRISTIANITY the First Three Thousand Years Diarmaid MacCulloch does not mention epidemics. However, he does point out that “What really offended (the non-Christians) was: Christian secretiveness and obstinate separation into their own world…… Yet the separateness and dogmatism of the early Christians were as much strengths as weaknesses; they produced a continuing stream of converts. This inward-looking community could attract people seeking certainty and comfort, not least in a physical sense. Christians looked after their poor – that was after all one of the main duties.”

Please note: Christians then formed their own communities.

Rodney Stark cites a different cause, one which proved even more successful, but came at a high personal price. In the year 165, when there were approximately 150,000 Christians in the Roman Empire, a smallpox epidemic, lasting for 15 years, killed from a quarter to a third of the empire’s population, including the then emperor Marcus Aurelius. At the first onset of the disease the heathen pushed the sufferers away and fled from their dearest, throwing them on the roads before they were dead and treated unburied corpses as dirt. The Christians, on the other hand, showed their values of love and charity, nursed the ill back to health, often at the expense of their own life. All this resulted in substantially higher rates of survival, while their unstinted service to the ill and afflicted drew in immense number of converts. Claims the author: “Had classical society not been disrupted and demoralized by these catastrophes, Christianity might never have become so dominant a faith.”

Johan Herman Bavinck commented on the early days of Christianity. He writes: “With a degree of nostalgia do we remember how in the ancient church baptism was experienced as real renewal. Then coming out of a pagan culture and the enchantments that life there offered, people would hesitantly approach the cross of Jesus Christ, where they would gradually being taken in by his word which displayed a new life in which only Christ was Lord and King. When then, at last, such persons, drawn from darkness, experienced baptism, a new world would open for them. That meant that they would often be shunned by their old friends, perhaps even their own parents, but they were received in a new circle, the communion of Christ and they would stand with that congregation in the life-connection of the risen Saviour. In the most perfect sense that was real renewal as the old was indeed a matter of the past, and look, it now all was new! In its ultimate sense the fact of baptism can only be compared with the Flood that once had consumed the ancient world, of which baptism, literally, was the symbol. Through that global baptism an old world, doomed to demise, drowned forever, and a new world arose, a world filled with God’s precious promises. Baptism meant forsaken the world and becoming a new person for the sake of Christ. It was submerging in Christ and again rising up in him. Baptism was the entrance to a new world, a new heaven and a new earth. It was custom at one time to assume a new name to show once and for all that the old person was dead and a new one was born in Christ. That is how radically people experienced the transition from the old to the new, from Adam to Christ, “The old has gone, the new has come!” (2 Cor. 5:17.)

This is an aspect Rodney Stark did not mention. Leaving the pagan Roman world and adopting the Christian way, meant a complete re-orientation. Conversion then was total. Just imagine the re-adjustment. Paganism too required all, as the Emperor was God, not unlike now when Capitalism is all-consuming. Allegiance to the Roman Ruler was mandatory. Festivals involved total allegiance. Converting to Christianity meant that everything was up for change: family relations, eating habits, living arrangements, living in new Christian communities. Yet these new converts still had to go out into the world, a world that lived under the full control of the evil one. They were still surrounded by secular life as it played out in the masses, in their own environment. Their work or job situation was in peril as well. Could they still make a living, now that they were estranged from neighbours and family?

A long time ago, when I was in business to appraise properties, I was asked by a business owner whether I was ‘born again.’ To me it was an embarrassing question because I knew that what he meant with ‘born again’ and what I understood it to be was totally different. For him it was enough if I answered in the affirmative. How could I explain to him that it involved much more than speaking in tongues and declaring Jesus as my Saviour? Yet today having the name of ‘Christian’ means very little: most people call themselves that way. For some it means attending religious schools and attending church. For most it may not even mean attending a service, something which is happening in ever decreasing numbers. Culturally there really is no difference between ‘Christians’ and non-Christians: we all drive cars, we all hope that the economy will grow, even though it means more pollution. We all hope to go to heaven, even though the Bible never mentions that. For many it means that the correct way to organize a church is along hierarchical lines, with priests, bishops, cardinals, usually excluding women.

In the old world, with The Rise of Christianity, the new converts were faced with totally different circumstances. Christians then and now are called to life, and that to the fullest. This week I was really struck by Matthew 7: 13-14: “Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction (to me this suggests the Capitalistic way), and many enter through it. But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it.” What could that mean?

 

I will probe that question next week in Part Eleven: The Fall of Christianity.

 

Posted in Co-owning the Earth | Tagged | Leave a comment